-
Good Scientists Pimp there Research (was: Damn, I'm boring...)
Define good. Let me say that up front. Good scientists, that is, if you say successful researchers are good scientists, secure good funding. Getting good funding requires doing the most relevant research (define relevant). Or, to put it bluntly, being a successful researcher requires to pimp your research. Doing boring research is nice for you, good for a Nobel prize if it turns out to have a cool spin off, but doesn’t buy you research success.
-
Finding differences between IChemObjects #2
CDK QSAR descriptors are not allowed to change the input [molecule|atom|bond], and I recently added a unit tests (rev 11138) for that to the abstract class AtomicDescriptorTest.
-
Finding differences between IChemObjects
CDK trunk is getting into shape, thanx to the many people who contribute to this, and special thanx to Miguel for cleaning up his code related to charge, resonance, and ionization potential calculations!
-
Development of the new JChemPaint
A quick screenshot, after some work on the JChemPaint code based on CDK
trunk/
. Nothing much to see, but a rather small code base, which is good. Today, I have set up cdk/cdk/trunk/ and cdk/jchempaint/trunk as Eclipse plugins, allowing the second to depend on the first. So, no more use of svn:externals. This is what it now looks like, and basically formalizes the end result of Niels’ work of last year: -
John Wilbanks replies to the ChemSpider/OpenData discussion
Not long after I posted my view on things, John posted his reply on the ChemSpider/OpenData discussion. His comment was merely to illustrate an internal advice to some organization, which got accidentally leaked. Anyway, a must read, with two good links to further reading on open data licensing.
-
Does ChemSpider really violate Open Data with CC SA?
ChemSpider is afraid they are doing something bad because they release their data as CC-BY-SA. Because, John Wilbanks says in Peter’s blog:
- •
- 1
- 2